Intel UHD Graphics 620 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 620
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 2.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 35 Watt
- 32x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1042 versus 570
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 241 versus 116
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4592 versus 2363
- 5.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.062 versus 4.651
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 273.504 versus 213.211
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.777 versus 0.624
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.939 versus 10.521
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 31.881 versus 23.978
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1397 versus 1056
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2227 versus 1352
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1397 versus 1056
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2227 versus 1352
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 5 January 2011 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 35 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1042 versus 570 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 versus 116 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4592 versus 2363 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 versus 4.651 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 versus 213.211 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 versus 0.624 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 versus 10.521 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 versus 23.978 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1397 versus 1056 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2227 versus 1352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1397 versus 1056 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2227 versus 1352 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M
- 2.5x plus de vitesse du noyau: 740 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 4x plus de pipelines: 96 versus 24
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1790 versus 878
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1790 versus 878
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 740 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 96 versus 24 |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1790 versus 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1790 versus 878 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1042 | 570 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 | 116 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4592 | 2363 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 | 4.651 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 | 213.211 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 | 0.624 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 | 10.521 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 | 23.978 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1397 | 1056 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 878 | 1790 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2227 | 1352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1397 | 1056 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 878 | 1790 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2227 | 1352 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 62 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Fermi |
| Nom de code | Kaby Lake GT2 | GF108 |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 5 January 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1380 | 1504 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 740 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 96 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 585 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 96 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 284.16 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 11.8 billion / sec | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 32 GB | 1 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | 0 |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 900 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics 620 avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 7500
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder 9000 PRO
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M340
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 910M
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
IntelHD Graphics 520
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8370D IGP
