Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel UHD Graphics 620

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620

Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 11 month(s) later
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
12.1x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 182 Watt
36.6x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 896 MB

Launch date	1 September 2017 vs 16 September 2008
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 182 Watt
Maximum memory size	32 GB vs 896 MB

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

Around 92% higher core clock speed: 576 MHz vs 300 MHz
9x more pipelines: 216 vs 24

Core clock speed	576 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines	216 vs 24

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

Name	Intel UHD Graphics 620	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
PassMark - G3D Mark	1042
PassMark - G2D Mark	241
Geekbench - OpenCL	4592
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	27.062
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	273.504
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.777
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	19.939
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	31.881
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	878
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2227
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	878
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2227
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	62

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel UHD Graphics 620	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 9.5	Tesla 2.0
Code name	Kaby Lake GT2	GT200
Launch date	1 September 2017	16 September 2008
Place in performance rating	1380	not rated
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$299
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1150 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz	576 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	65 nm
Pipelines	24	216
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	182 Watt
Transistor count	189 million	1,400 million
Floating-point performance		536.5 gflops
Texture fill rate		41.5 GTexel / s
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length		267 mm
Supplementary power connectors		2x 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	10.0
OpenGL	4.5	3.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	32 GB	896 MB
Memory bus width	64 / 128 Bit	448 Bit
Memory type	LPDDR3 / DDR4	GDDR3
Shared memory	1
Memory bandwidth		111.9 GB / s
Memory clock speed		1998 MHz
Technologies
Quick Sync