Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 64 Watt
- 32x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 2% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4592 vs 4493
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.062 vs 12.582
- Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.777 vs 1.254
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.939 vs 18.386
- Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 31.881 vs 23.499
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 27 November 2013 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 64 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4592 vs 4493 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 vs 12.582 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 vs 1.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 vs 18.386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 vs 23.499 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
- 3.5x more core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
- Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1749 vs 1042
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 368 vs 241
- Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 364.463 vs 273.504
- Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2663 vs 1397
- 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3478 vs 878
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3332 vs 2227
- Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2663 vs 1397
- 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3478 vs 878
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3332 vs 2227
- 8.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 545 vs 62
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1749 vs 1042 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 368 vs 241 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.463 vs 273.504 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2663 vs 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 vs 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 vs 2227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2663 vs 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 vs 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 vs 2227 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 545 vs 62 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1042 | 1749 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 | 368 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4592 | 4493 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 | 12.582 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 | 364.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 | 1.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 | 18.386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 | 23.499 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1397 | 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 878 | 3478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2227 | 3332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1397 | 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 878 | 3478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2227 | 3332 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 62 | 545 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kepler |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | GK106 |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 27 November 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1380 | 1003 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
Price now | $144.81 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 16.05 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1058 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 384 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 64 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 2,540 million |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Floating-point performance | 812.5 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 33.9 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 5.70" (14.5 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128-bit GDDR5 |
Memory type | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 80.0 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 5.0 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
TXAA |