Intel UHD Graphics 620 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 620
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 4.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 64 Watt
- 32x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4592 versus 4493
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.062 versus 12.582
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.777 versus 1.254
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.939 versus 18.386
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 31.881 versus 23.499
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 27 November 2013 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 64 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4592 versus 4493 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 versus 12.582 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 versus 1.254 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 versus 18.386 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 versus 23.499 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
- 3.5x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1058 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 16x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 24
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1749 versus 1042
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 368 versus 241
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 364.463 versus 273.504
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2663 versus 1397
- 4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3478 versus 878
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3332 versus 2227
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2663 versus 1397
- 4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3478 versus 878
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3332 versus 2227
- 8.8x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 545 versus 62
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1058 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 24 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1749 versus 1042 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 368 versus 241 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.463 versus 273.504 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2663 versus 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 versus 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 versus 2227 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2663 versus 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 versus 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 versus 2227 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 545 versus 62 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1042 | 1749 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 | 368 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4592 | 4493 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 | 12.582 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 | 364.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 | 1.254 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 | 18.386 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 | 23.499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1397 | 2663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 878 | 3478 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2227 | 3332 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1397 | 2663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 878 | 3478 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2227 | 3332 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 62 | 545 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Kaby Lake GT2 | GK106 |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 27 November 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1380 | 1003 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109 | |
| Prix maintenant | $144.81 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 16.05 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 1058 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 64 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 2,540 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 384 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 812.5 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 33.9 billion / sec | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 5.70" (14.5 cm) | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 32 GB | 1 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 128-bit GDDR5 |
| Genre de mémoire | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.0 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5.0 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics 620 avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 7500
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder 9000 PRO
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M340
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 910M
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
IntelHD Graphics 520
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8370D IGP
