Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1085 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 4x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 60 Watt
• 16x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 2 GB

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

• 3.4x more core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 26.7x more pipelines: 640 vs 24
• 3.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 vs 1042
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 vs 241
• 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11526 vs 4592
• Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 vs 27.062
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 642.715 vs 273.504
• Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.933 vs 1.777
• Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 26.532 vs 19.939
• 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 133.458 vs 31.881
• 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 vs 1397
• 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 878
• Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 vs 2227
• 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 vs 1397
• 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 878
• Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 vs 2227
• Around 89% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 117 vs 62

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1042 3901
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	241 521
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4592 11526
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.062 42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	273.504 642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.777 2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.939 26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.881 133.458
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 3329
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	62 117

Compare specifications (specs)