Intel UHD Graphics 620 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 620
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 6% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1150 MHz versus 1085 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 60 Watt
- 16x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 2 GB
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 18 February 2014 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz versus 1085 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 60 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB versus 2 GB |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- 3.4x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1020 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 26.7x plus de pipelines: 640 versus 24
- 3.7x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 versus 1042
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 versus 241
- 2.5x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11526 versus 4592
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 versus 27.062
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 642.715 versus 273.504
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.933 versus 1.777
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 26.532 versus 19.939
- 4.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 133.458 versus 31.881
- 3.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 versus 1397
- 4.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 versus 878
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 versus 2227
- 3.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 versus 1397
- 4.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 versus 878
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 versus 2227
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 117 versus 62
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1020 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 640 versus 24 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3901 versus 1042 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 521 versus 241 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11526 versus 4592 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 versus 27.062 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 versus 273.504 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 versus 1.777 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.532 versus 19.939 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 versus 31.881 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 versus 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 versus 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 versus 2227 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 versus 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 versus 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 versus 2227 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 117 versus 62 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1042 | 3901 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 | 521 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4592 | 11526 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 | 42.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 | 642.715 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 | 2.933 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 | 26.532 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 | 133.458 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1397 | 4843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 878 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2227 | 3329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1397 | 4843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 878 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2227 | 3329 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 62 | 117 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | Kaby Lake GT2 | GM107 |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 18 February 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1380 | 707 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | |
| Prix maintenant | $299.01 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.02 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 1020 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 640 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 1,870 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 640 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,389 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 43.4 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 32 GB | 2 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | 0 |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 86.4 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5.4 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics 620 avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 7500
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder 9000 PRO
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M340
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 910M
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
IntelHD Graphics 520
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8370D IGP
