Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs AMD Radeon HD 6670

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and AMD Radeon HD 6670 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 50% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 800 MHz
• Around 50% higher texture fill rate: 28.8 GTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 4.4x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 66 Watt
• Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1237 vs 724
• Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 299 vs 247
• 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4657 vs 1905
• 5.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.517 vs 4.861
• Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 354.254 vs 235.463
• 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.807 vs 0.463
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.323 vs 15.918
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1870 vs 1564
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1870 vs 1564

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6670

• 20x more pipelines: 480 vs 24
• Around 67% better floating-point performance: 768.0 gflops vs 460.8 gflops
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 38.551 vs 29.327
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3260 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3348 vs 3309
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3260 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3348 vs 3309

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6670

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1237 724
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	299 247
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4657 1905
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.517 4.861
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	354.254 235.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.807 0.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.323 15.918
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.327 38.551
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 1564
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 3260
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3348
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 1564
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 3260
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3348

Compare specifications (specs)