Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
• 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100

• 2.6x more core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 350 MHz
• Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 39.01 GTexel / s vs 28.8 GTexel / s
• 21.3x more pipelines: 512 vs 24
• 2.7x better floating-point performance: 1,248 gflops vs 460.8 gflops
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2629 vs 1237
• Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 432 vs 299
• 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10611 vs 4657
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 29.959 vs 27.517
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 864.134 vs 354.254
• Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.893 vs 1.807
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.305 vs 20.323
• 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 122.245 vs 29.327
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4551 vs 1870
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3607 vs 1596
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3309
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4551 vs 1870
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3607 vs 1596
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3309

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1237 2629
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	299 432
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4657 10611
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.517 29.959
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	354.254 864.134
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.807 2.893
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.323 49.305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.327 122.245
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 4551
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 3607
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 4551
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 3607
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3359

Compare specifications (specs)