Intel UHD Graphics 630 versus AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100

Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 630 and AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel UHD Graphics 630

versus

AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 630

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
4.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 65 Watt

Date de sortie	1 September 2017 versus 12 June 2017
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt versus 65 Watt

Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100

2.6x plus de vitesse du noyau: 925 MHz versus 350 MHz
Environ 2% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1219 MHz versus 1200 MHz
Environ 35% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 39.01 GTexel / s versus 28.8 GTexel / s
21.3x plus de pipelines: 512 versus 24
2.7x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,248 gflops versus 460.8 gflops
2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2629 versus 1237
Environ 44% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 432 versus 299
2.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 10611 versus 4657
Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 29.959 versus 27.517
2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 864.134 versus 354.254
Environ 60% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.893 versus 1.807
2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.305 versus 20.323
4.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 122.245 versus 29.327
2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4551 versus 1870
2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3607 versus 1596
Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 versus 3309
2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4551 versus 1870
2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3607 versus 1596
Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 versus 3309

Caractéristiques
Vitesse du noyau	925 MHz versus 350 MHz
Vitesse augmenté	1219 MHz versus 1200 MHz
Taux de remplissage de la texture	39.01 GTexel / s versus 28.8 GTexel / s
Pipelines	512 versus 24
Performance á point flottant	1,248 gflops versus 460.8 gflops
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	2629 versus 1237
PassMark - G2D Mark	432 versus 299
Geekbench - OpenCL	10611 versus 4657
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	29.959 versus 27.517
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	864.134 versus 354.254
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.893 versus 1.807
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	49.305 versus 20.323
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	122.245 versus 29.327
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4551 versus 1870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3607 versus 1596
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359 versus 3309
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4551 versus 1870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3607 versus 1596
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359 versus 3309

Comparer les références

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1237

2629

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

299

432

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

4657

10611

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

27.517

29.959

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

354.254

864.134

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.807

2.893

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

20.323

49.305

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

29.327

122.245

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1870

4551

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1596

3607

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3309

3359

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1870

4551

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1596

3607

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3309

3359

Nom	Intel UHD Graphics 630	AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100
PassMark - G3D Mark	1237	2629
PassMark - G2D Mark	299	432
Geekbench - OpenCL	4657	10611
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	27.517	29.959
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	354.254	864.134
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.807	2.893
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	20.323	49.305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	29.327	122.245
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1870	4551
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1596	3607
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3309	3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1870	4551
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1596	3607
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3309	3359
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	68

Comparer les caractéristiques

	Intel UHD Graphics 630	AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100
Essentiel
Architecture	Generation 9.5	GCN 4.0
Nom de code	Coffee Lake GT2	Lexa
Date de sortie	1 September 2017	12 June 2017
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	1234	704
Genre	Desktop	Workstation
Prix de sortie (MSRP)		$199
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1200 MHz	1219 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	350 MHz	925 MHz
Performance á point flottant	460.8 gflops	1,248 gflops
Processus de fabrication	14 nm	14 nm
Pipelines	24	512
Taux de remplissage de la texture	28.8 GTexel / s	39.01 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	65 Watt
Compte de transistor	189 million	2,200 million
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 3.0 x8
Longeur		145 mm
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires		None
Soutien API
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (12_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Mémoire
Largeur du bus mémoire	64 / 128 Bit	128 Bit
Mémoire partagé	1
RAM maximale		4 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire		96 GB / s
Vitesse de mémoire		6000 MHz
Genre de mémoire		GDDR5
Technologies
Quick Sync