Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs AMD Radeon R4 Graphics

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and AMD Radeon R4 Graphics videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• 4.5x more texture fill rate: 28.8 GTexel / s vs 6.4 GTexel / s
• 2.3x better floating-point performance: 460.8 gflops vs 204.8 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 3.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1237 vs 342
• 3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 299 vs 99
• 5.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.517 vs 4.721
• 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 354.254 vs 107.613
• 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.807 vs 0.445
• Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.323 vs 10.612
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 29.327 vs 13.097
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1870 vs 701
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1596 vs 1338
• Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 1811
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1870 vs 701
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1596 vs 1338
• Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 1811

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R4 Graphics

• 2.3x more core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 350 MHz
• 5.3x more pipelines: 128 vs 24
• Around 80% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8386 vs 4657

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R4 Graphics

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1237 342
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	299 99
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4657 8386
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.517 4.721
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	354.254 107.613
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.807 0.445
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.323 10.612
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.327 13.097
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 701
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 1338
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 1811
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 701
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 1338
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 1811

Compare specifications (specs)