Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs AMD Radeon R5 230

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and AMD Radeon R5 230 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
  • 5.8x more texture fill rate: 28.8 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
  • 2.3x better floating-point performance: 460.8 gflops vs 200.0 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
  • Around 27% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 19 Watt
  • 5.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1237 vs 222
  • Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 299 vs 255
  • Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4657 vs 4127
  • 4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1870 vs 439
  • Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1596 vs 992
  • Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 2480
  • 4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1870 vs 439
  • Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1596 vs 992
  • Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 2480
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 September 2017 vs 3 April 2014
Texture fill rate 28.8 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance 460.8 gflops vs 200.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 19 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1237 vs 222
PassMark - G2D Mark 299 vs 255
Geekbench - OpenCL 4657 vs 4127
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1870 vs 439
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1596 vs 992
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3309 vs 2480
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1870 vs 439
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1596 vs 992
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3309 vs 2480

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 230

  • 6.7x more pipelines: 160 vs 24
Pipelines 160 vs 24

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 230

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1237
222
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
299
255
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
4657
4127
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1870
439
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1596
992
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3309
2480
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1870
439
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1596
992
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3309
2480
Name Intel UHD Graphics 630 AMD Radeon R5 230
PassMark - G3D Mark 1237 222
PassMark - G2D Mark 299 255
Geekbench - OpenCL 4657 4127
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 27.517
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 354.254
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.807
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 20.323
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 29.327
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1870 439
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1596 992
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3309 2480
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1870 439
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1596 992
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3309 2480
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 68

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel UHD Graphics 630 AMD Radeon R5 230

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 TeraScale 2
Code name Coffee Lake GT2 Caicos
Launch date 1 September 2017 3 April 2014
Place in performance rating 1234 1319
Type Desktop Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R5 200 Series
Price now $50
Value for money (0-100) 6.10

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1200 MHz
Core clock speed 350 MHz
Floating-point performance 460.8 gflops 200.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 24 160
Texture fill rate 28.8 GTexel / s 5 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 19 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 370 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus support PCIe 1.0 x4
Length 168 mm
Supplementary power connectors N / A

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 11
OpenGL 4.6 4.4

Memory

Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 64 Bit
Shared memory 1
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 10.67 GB / s
Memory type DDR3

Technologies

Quick Sync
AMD Eyefinity
CrossFire
DDMA audio
​PowerPlay