Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs AMD Radeon R5 230
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and AMD Radeon R5 230 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 5.8x more texture fill rate: 28.8 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
- 2.3x better floating-point performance: 460.8 gflops vs 200.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 27% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 19 Watt
- 5.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1237 vs 222
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 299 vs 255
- Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4657 vs 4127
- 4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1870 vs 439
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1596 vs 992
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 2480
- 4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1870 vs 439
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1596 vs 992
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 2480
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 3 April 2014 |
Texture fill rate | 28.8 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 460.8 gflops vs 200.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 19 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 vs 222 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 vs 255 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4657 vs 4127 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 vs 439 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 vs 992 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 vs 2480 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 vs 439 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 vs 992 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 vs 2480 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 230
- 6.7x more pipelines: 160 vs 24
Pipelines | 160 vs 24 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 230
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | AMD Radeon R5 230 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 | 222 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 | 255 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4657 | 4127 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | 439 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | 992 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 2480 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | 439 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | 992 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 2480 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 68 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 630 | AMD Radeon R5 230 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Coffee Lake GT2 | Caicos |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 3 April 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1234 | 1319 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R5 200 Series | |
Price now | $50 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 6.10 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 460.8 gflops | 200.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 160 |
Texture fill rate | 28.8 GTexel / s | 5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 19 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 370 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCIe 1.0 x4 | |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | N / A | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 10.67 GB / s | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
PowerPlay |