Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 54% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 780 MHz
• Around 54% higher texture fill rate: 28.8 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
• Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1243 vs 921
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.89 vs 12.111
• Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 340.911 vs 253.178
• Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.785 vs 1.211
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1870 vs 1645
• Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 1677
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1870 vs 1645
• Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 1677

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM

• 2.1x more core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 350 MHz
• 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
• Around 30% better floating-point performance: 599.0 gflops vs 460.8 gflops
• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 304 vs 302
• Around 25% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5827 vs 4672
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 23.777 vs 20.414
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 73.506 vs 29.514
• Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2426 vs 1596
• Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2426 vs 1596

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1243 921
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	302 304
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4672 5827
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.89 12.111
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	340.911 253.178
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.785 1.211
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.414 23.777
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.514 73.506
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 1645
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 2426
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 1677
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 1645
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 2426
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 1677

Compare specifications (specs)