Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 75% higher core clock speed: 350 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 2.8x more texture fill rate: 28.8 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s
- 4.4x better floating-point performance: 460.8 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1237 vs 1180
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 27 May 2013 |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 28.8 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 460.8 gflops vs 104.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 22 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 30 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 vs 1180 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 40 vs 24
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 390 vs 299
- Around 9% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5083 vs 4657
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2095 vs 1870
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3285 vs 1596
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2095 vs 1870
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3285 vs 1596
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Pipelines | 40 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 390 vs 299 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5083 vs 4657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2095 vs 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3285 vs 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2095 vs 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3285 vs 1596 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 | 1180 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 | 390 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4657 | 5083 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | 2095 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | 2095 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 68 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 630 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Generation 7.5 |
Code name | Coffee Lake GT2 | Haswell GT3e |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 27 May 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1234 | 661 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 200 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 460.8 gflops | 104.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 40 |
Texture fill rate | 28.8 GTexel / s | 10.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 392 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Shared memory | 1 | 1 |
Memory type | eDRAM | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |