Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
• Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 299 vs 225

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M

• Around 25% higher texture fill rate: 36.08 GTexel / s vs 28.8 GTexel / s
• 26.7x more pipelines: 640 vs 24
• 2.5x better floating-point performance: 1,155 gflops vs 460.8 gflops
• 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2521 vs 1237
• 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9809 vs 4657
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.761 vs 27.517
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 388.248 vs 354.254
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.428 vs 1.807
• Around 91% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.889 vs 20.323
• 5.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 151.016 vs 29.327
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3817 vs 1870
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3309
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3817 vs 1870
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3309
• 14.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 979 vs 68

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1237 2521
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	299 225
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4657 9809
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.517 37.761
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	354.254 388.248
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.807 2.428
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.323 38.889
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.327 151.016
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 3817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 3817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3353
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	68 979

Compare specifications (specs)