Intel UHD Graphics 630 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 630
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 45 Watt
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 299 versus 225
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 12 March 2014 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 45 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 versus 225 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
- Environ 25% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 36.08 GTexel / s versus 28.8 GTexel / s
- 26.7x plus de pipelines: 640 versus 24
- 2.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,155 gflops versus 460.8 gflops
- 2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2521 versus 1237
- 2.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9809 versus 4657
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.761 versus 27.517
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 388.248 versus 354.254
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.428 versus 1.807
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.889 versus 20.323
- 5.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 151.016 versus 29.327
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3817 versus 1870
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 versus 1596
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 versus 3309
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3817 versus 1870
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 versus 1596
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 versus 3309
- 14.4x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 979 versus 68
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 36.08 GTexel / s versus 28.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 versus 24 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,155 gflops versus 460.8 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2521 versus 1237 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9809 versus 4657 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.761 versus 27.517 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 388.248 versus 354.254 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.428 versus 1.807 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.889 versus 20.323 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 151.016 versus 29.327 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3817 versus 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 versus 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 versus 3309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3817 versus 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 versus 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 versus 3309 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 979 versus 68 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 | 2521 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 | 225 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4657 | 9809 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 | 37.761 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 | 388.248 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 | 2.428 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 | 38.889 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 | 151.016 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | 3817 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | 3817 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 68 | 979 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | Coffee Lake GT2 | GM107 |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 12 March 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1234 | 896 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 460.8 gflops | 1,155 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 640 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 GTexel / s | 36.08 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 1,870 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 640 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | 0 |
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.0 GB / s | |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3, GDDR5 | |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 or GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics 630 avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
ATIRadeon 9200 PRO
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6550D
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon R7 240
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 840M
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 617
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon 680M
