Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1178 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 9.9x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 148 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

• 3x more core clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 350 MHz
• 3.8x more texture fill rate: 109 billion / sec vs 28.8 GTexel / s
• 69.3x more pipelines: 1664 vs 24
• 8.5x better floating-point performance: 3,920 gflops vs 460.8 gflops
• 7.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9640 vs 1237
• 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 766 vs 299
• 6.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 28498 vs 4657
• 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 105.107 vs 27.517
• 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1225.96 vs 354.254
• 4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.737 vs 1.807
• Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.714 vs 20.323
• 16.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 490.688 vs 29.327
• 6.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11499 vs 1870
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 3309
• 6.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11499 vs 1870
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 3309
• 5.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 369 vs 68

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1237 9640
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	299 766
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4657 28498
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.517 105.107
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	354.254 1225.96
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.807 8.737
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.323 35.714
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.327 490.688
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 11499
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 11499
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3340
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	68 369

Compare specifications (specs)