Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1075 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 16.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 250 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

• 2.9x more core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 350 MHz
• 6.1x more texture fill rate: 176 billion / sec vs 28.8 GTexel / s
• 117.3x more pipelines: 2816 vs 24
• 13.2x better floating-point performance: 6,060 gflops vs 460.8 gflops
• 11.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13758 vs 1237
• 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 852 vs 299
• 9.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 42988 vs 4657
• 5.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 145.843 vs 27.517
• 4.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1722.98 vs 354.254
• 6.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.661 vs 1.807
• Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.16 vs 20.323
• 26.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 788.464 vs 29.327
• 5.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10471 vs 1870
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3695 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3338 vs 3309
• 5.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10471 vs 1870
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3695 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3338 vs 3309
• 19.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1321 vs 68

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1237 13758
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	299 852
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4657 42988
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.517 145.843
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	354.254 1722.98
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.807 11.661
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.323 37.16
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.327 788.464
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 10471
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3338
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 10471
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3338
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	68 1321

Compare specifications (specs)