Intel UHD Graphics 630 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel UHD Graphics 630

versus

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 630

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 2 mois plus tard
Environ 12% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1200 MHz versus 1075 MHz
Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
16.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 250 Watt

Date de sortie	1 September 2017 versus 2 June 2015
Vitesse augmenté	1200 MHz versus 1075 MHz
Processus de fabrication	14 nm versus 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt versus 250 Watt

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

2.9x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1000 MHz versus 350 MHz
times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 176 billion / sec versus 28.8 GTexel / s
117.3x plus de pipelines: 2816 versus 24
13.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 6,060 gflops versus 460.8 gflops
11.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 13758 versus 1237
2.8x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 852 versus 299
9.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 42988 versus 4657
5.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 145.843 versus 27.517
4.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1722.98 versus 354.254
6.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.661 versus 1.807
Environ 83% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.16 versus 20.323
26.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 788.464 versus 29.327
5.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10471 versus 1870
2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3695 versus 1596
Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3338 versus 3309
5.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10471 versus 1870
2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3695 versus 1596
Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3338 versus 3309
19.4x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1321 versus 68

Caractéristiques
Vitesse du noyau	1000 MHz versus 350 MHz
Taux de remplissage de la texture	176 billion / sec versus 28.8 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2816 versus 24
Performance á point flottant	6,060 gflops versus 460.8 gflops
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	13758 versus 1237
PassMark - G2D Mark	852 versus 299
Geekbench - OpenCL	42988 versus 4657
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	145.843 versus 27.517
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1722.98 versus 354.254
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	11.661 versus 1.807
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	37.16 versus 20.323
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	788.464 versus 29.327
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	10471 versus 1870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3695 versus 1596
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3338 versus 3309
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	10471 versus 1870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3695 versus 1596
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3338 versus 3309
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1321 versus 68

Comparer les références

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1237

13758

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

299

852

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

4657

42988

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

27.517

145.843

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

354.254

1722.98

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.807

11.661

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

20.323

37.16

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

29.327

788.464

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1870

10471

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1596

3695

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3309

3338

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1870

10471

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1596

3695

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3309

3338

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

1321

Nom	Intel UHD Graphics 630	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark	1237	13758
PassMark - G2D Mark	299	852
Geekbench - OpenCL	4657	42988
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	27.517	145.843
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	354.254	1722.98
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.807	11.661
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	20.323	37.16
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	29.327	788.464
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1870	10471
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1596	3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3309	3338
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1870	10471
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1596	3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3309	3338
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	68	1321

Comparer les caractéristiques

	Intel UHD Graphics 630	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Essentiel
Architecture	Generation 9.5	Maxwell 2.0
Nom de code	Coffee Lake GT2	GM200
Date de sortie	1 September 2017	2 June 2015
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	1234	310
Genre	Desktop	Desktop
Prix de sortie (MSRP)		$649
Prix maintenant		$679.99
Valeur pour le prix (0-100)		23.43
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1200 MHz	1075 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	350 MHz	1000 MHz
Performance á point flottant	460.8 gflops	6,060 gflops
Processus de fabrication	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	24	2816
Taux de remplissage de la texture	28.8 GTexel / s	176 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	250 Watt
Compte de transistor	189 million	8,000 million
Noyaux CUDA		2816
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI		Internal
Soutien de G-SYNC
HDCP
Résolution VGA maximale		2048x1536
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 3.0 x16
Soutien de bus		PCI Express 3.0
Hauteur		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Longeur		10.5" (26.7 cm)
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU)		600 Watt
Options SLI		4x
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires		6-pin + 8-pin
Soutien API
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Mémoire
Largeur du bus mémoire	64 / 128 Bit	384 Bit
Mémoire partagé	1	0
RAM maximale		6 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire		336.5 GB / s
Vitesse de mémoire		7.0 GB/s
Genre de mémoire		GDDR5
Technologies
Quick Sync
3D Vision
Adaptive Vertical Sync
CUDA
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
SLI
Surround