Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 3.3x more texture fill rate: 28.8 GTexel / s vs 8.8 GTexel / s
- 4x better floating-point performance: 460.8 gflops vs 116.16 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
- 5.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1243 vs 215
- 5.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 302 vs 56
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 1814
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 1814
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 7 January 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 28.8 GTexel / s vs 8.8 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 460.8 gflops vs 116.16 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1243 vs 215 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 302 vs 56 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 vs 1814 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 vs 1814 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
- Around 57% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 2x more pipelines: 48 vs 24
- Around 40% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6543 vs 4672
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 550 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Pipelines | 48 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6543 vs 4672 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1243 | 215 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 302 | 56 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4672 | 6543 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.89 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 340.911 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.785 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.414 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.514 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 1814 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 1814 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 421 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Coffee Lake GT2 | GT216 |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 7 January 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1219 | 1548 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 550 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 460.8 gflops | 116.16 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 28.8 GTexel / s | 8.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 486 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 25.28 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 1580 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3, DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |