Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • 3.3x more texture fill rate: 28.8 GTexel / s vs 8.8 GTexel / s
  • 4x better floating-point performance: 460.8 gflops vs 116.16 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
  • 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
  • 5.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1243 vs 215
  • 5.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 302 vs 56
  • Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 1814
  • Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 1814
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 September 2017 vs 7 January 2010
Texture fill rate 28.8 GTexel / s vs 8.8 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance 460.8 gflops vs 116.16 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1243 vs 215
PassMark - G2D Mark 302 vs 56
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3309 vs 1814
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3309 vs 1814

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

  • Around 57% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 350 MHz
  • 2x more pipelines: 48 vs 24
  • Around 40% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6543 vs 4672
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 550 MHz vs 350 MHz
Pipelines 48 vs 24
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 6543 vs 4672

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1243
215
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
302
56
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
4672
6543
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3309
1814
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3309
1814
Name Intel UHD Graphics 630 NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
PassMark - G3D Mark 1243 215
PassMark - G2D Mark 302 56
Geekbench - OpenCL 4672 6543
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 27.89
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 340.911
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.785
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 20.414
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 29.514
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1596
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3309 1814
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1596
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3309 1814
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 421

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel UHD Graphics 630 NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 Tesla 2.0
Code name Coffee Lake GT2 GT216
Launch date 1 September 2017 7 January 2010
Place in performance rating 1219 1548
Type Desktop Mobile workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1200 MHz
Core clock speed 350 MHz 550 MHz
Floating-point performance 460.8 gflops 116.16 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 24 48
Texture fill rate 28.8 GTexel / s 8.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 486 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 MXM-A (3.0)
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 10.1
OpenGL 4.6 3.3

Memory

Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 128 Bit
Shared memory 1 0
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 25.28 GB / s
Memory clock speed 1580 MHz
Memory type GDDR3, DDR3

Technologies

Quick Sync