Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 1680
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 1680
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 6 February 2017 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 vs 1680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 vs 1680 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
- 4.4x more core clock speed: 1557 MHz vs 350 MHz
- Around 34% higher boost clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 3.3x more texture fill rate: 94.72 GTexel / s vs 28.8 GTexel / s
- 42.7x more pipelines: 1024 vs 24
- 6.6x better floating-point performance: 3,031 gflops vs 460.8 gflops
- 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8429 vs 1870
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1825 vs 1596
- 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8429 vs 1870
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1825 vs 1596
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1557 MHz vs 350 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 94.72 GTexel / s vs 28.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 24 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,031 gflops vs 460.8 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8429 vs 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1825 vs 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8429 vs 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1825 vs 1596 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4657 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | 8429 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | 1825 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 1680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | 8429 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | 1825 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 1680 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 68 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Pascal |
| Code name | Coffee Lake GT2 | GP107 |
| Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 6 February 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 1234 | 672 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1607 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 1557 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 460.8 gflops | 3,031 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 1024 |
| Texture fill rate | 28.8 GTexel / s | 94.72 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 3,300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 160 Bit |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 5 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 140.2 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel UHD Graphics 630 with others
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
ATIRadeon 9200 PRO
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6550D
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon R7 240
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 840M
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 617
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon 680M
