Intel UHD Graphics 630 versus NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 630
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 mois plus tard
- 5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 75 Watt
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 versus 1680
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 versus 1680
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 6 February 2017 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 75 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 versus 1680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 versus 1680 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
- 4.4x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1557 MHz versus 350 MHz
- Environ 34% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1607 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 94.72 GTexel / s versus 28.8 GTexel / s
- 42.7x plus de pipelines: 1024 versus 24
- 6.6x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,031 gflops versus 460.8 gflops
- 4.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8429 versus 1870
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1825 versus 1596
- 4.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8429 versus 1870
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1825 versus 1596
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1557 MHz versus 350 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1607 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 94.72 GTexel / s versus 28.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1024 versus 24 |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,031 gflops versus 460.8 gflops |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8429 versus 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1825 versus 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8429 versus 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1825 versus 1596 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4657 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | 8429 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | 1825 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 1680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | 8429 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | 1825 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 1680 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 68 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Pascal |
| Nom de code | Coffee Lake GT2 | GP107 |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 6 February 2017 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1234 | 672 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | 1607 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 1557 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 460.8 gflops | 3,031 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 1024 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 GTexel / s | 94.72 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 3,300 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 160 Bit |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
| RAM maximale | 5 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 140.2 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics 630 avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
ATIRadeon 9200 PRO
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6550D
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon R7 240
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 840M
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 617
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon 680M
