Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA Quadro P400

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA Quadro P400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
• Around 36% higher texture fill rate: 28.8 GTexel / s vs 21.25 GTexel / s
• 2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
• Around 53% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4657 vs 3053
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.517 vs 19.856
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 354.254 vs 309.824
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.807 vs 1.38

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P400

• 3.5x more core clock speed: 1228 MHz vs 350 MHz
• Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1252 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• 10.7x more pipelines: 256 vs 24
• Around 48% better floating-point performance: 679.9 gflops vs 460.8 gflops
• Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1651 vs 1237
• Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 435 vs 299
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 25.011 vs 20.323
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 84.489 vs 29.327
• Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2709 vs 1870
• Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2875 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3328 vs 3309
• Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2709 vs 1870
• Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2875 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3328 vs 3309
• 9.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 617 vs 68

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P400

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1237 1651
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	299 435
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4657 3053
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.517 19.856
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	354.254 309.824
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.807 1.38
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.323 25.011
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.327 84.489
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 2709
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 2875
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3328
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 2709
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 2875
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3328
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	68 617

Compare specifications (specs)