Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA Quadro P400
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA Quadro P400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 36% higher texture fill rate: 28.8 GTexel / s vs 21.25 GTexel / s
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
- Around 53% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4665 vs 3053
- Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.682 vs 20.138
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 356.144 vs 318.72
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.807 vs 1.391
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 7 February 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 28.8 GTexel / s vs 21.25 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 30 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4665 vs 3053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.682 vs 20.138 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 356.144 vs 318.72 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 vs 1.391 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P400
- 3.5x more core clock speed: 1228 MHz vs 350 MHz
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1252 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 10.7x more pipelines: 256 vs 24
- Around 48% better floating-point performance: 679.9 gflops vs 460.8 gflops
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1636 vs 1245
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 438 vs 302
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.886 vs 21.594
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 84.858 vs 29.452
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2709 vs 1870
- Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2875 vs 1596
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3328 vs 3309
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2709 vs 1870
- Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2875 vs 1596
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3328 vs 3309
- Around 47% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 617 vs 420
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1228 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1252 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Pipelines | 256 vs 24 |
Floating-point performance | 679.9 gflops vs 460.8 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1636 vs 1245 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 438 vs 302 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.886 vs 21.594 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.858 vs 29.452 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2709 vs 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2875 vs 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3328 vs 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2709 vs 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2875 vs 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3328 vs 3309 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 617 vs 420 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P400
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA Quadro P400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1245 | 1636 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 302 | 438 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4665 | 3053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.682 | 20.138 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 356.144 | 318.72 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 | 1.391 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.594 | 24.886 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.452 | 84.858 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | 2709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | 2875 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 3328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | 2709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | 2875 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 3328 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 420 | 617 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA Quadro P400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Pascal |
Code name | Coffee Lake GT2 | GP107 |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 7 February 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 1220 | 991 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $119.99 | |
Price now | $119.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 18.70 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1252 MHz |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 1228 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 460.8 gflops | 679.9 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 256 |
Texture fill rate | 28.8 GTexel / s | 21.25 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 3,300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 3x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 32.1 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |