Intel UHD Graphics 630 versus NVIDIA Quadro P400
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA Quadro P400 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 630
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 36% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 28.8 GTexel / s versus 21.25 GTexel / s
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 30 Watt
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4672 versus 3053
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.89 versus 20.138
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 340.911 versus 318.72
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.785 versus 1.391
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 7 February 2017 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 GTexel / s versus 21.25 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 30 Watt |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4672 versus 3053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.89 versus 20.138 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 340.911 versus 318.72 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.785 versus 1.391 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P400
- 3.5x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1228 MHz versus 350 MHz
- Environ 4% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1252 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- 10.7x plus de pipelines: 256 versus 24
- Environ 48% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 679.9 gflops versus 460.8 gflops
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1638 versus 1244
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 442 versus 302
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.886 versus 20.414
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 84.858 versus 29.514
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2709 versus 1870
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2875 versus 1596
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3328 versus 3309
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2709 versus 1870
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2875 versus 1596
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3328 versus 3309
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 617 versus 421
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1228 MHz versus 350 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1252 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
Pipelines | 256 versus 24 |
Performance á point flottant | 679.9 gflops versus 460.8 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1638 versus 1244 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 442 versus 302 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.886 versus 20.414 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.858 versus 29.514 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2709 versus 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2875 versus 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3328 versus 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2709 versus 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2875 versus 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3328 versus 3309 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 617 versus 421 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P400
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA Quadro P400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1244 | 1638 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 302 | 442 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4672 | 3053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.89 | 20.138 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 340.911 | 318.72 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.785 | 1.391 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.414 | 24.886 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.514 | 84.858 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | 2709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | 2875 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 3328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | 2709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | 2875 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 3328 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 421 | 617 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA Quadro P400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Pascal |
Nom de code | Coffee Lake GT2 | GP107 |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 7 February 2017 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1219 | 992 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $119.99 | |
Prix maintenant | $119.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 18.70 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | 1252 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 1228 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 460.8 gflops | 679.9 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 256 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 GTexel / s | 21.25 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 30 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | 3,300 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 3x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 32.1 GB / s | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4012 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |