Intel UHD Graphics 750 vs AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 750 and AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 750

• Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 30% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• 520x more texture fill rate: 20.80 GTexel/s vs 40 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 8.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 125 Watt
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 35.179 vs 33.836
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 543.594 vs 506.712

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition

• 2.5x more pipelines: 640 vs 256
• Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2174 vs 1724
• Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 462 vs 364
• 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14263 vs 6447
• Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.01 vs 1.995
• Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.787 vs 29.322
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3707 vs 2899
• Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4524 vs 3219
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 14630 vs 11068
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3707 vs 2899
• Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4524 vs 3219
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 14630 vs 11068
• Around 11% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 711 vs 641

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 750
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1724 2174
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	364 462
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6447 14263
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	35.179 33.836
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	543.594 506.712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.995 3.01
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.322 49.787
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2899 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3219 4524
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11068 14630
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2899 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3219 4524
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11068 14630
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	641 711

Compare specifications (specs)