Intel UHD Graphics 750 versus AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 750 and AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Soutien API, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 750
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 13 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 30% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1300 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 20.80 GTexel/s versus 40 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 8.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 125 Watt
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 35.179 versus 33.836
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 543.594 versus 506.712
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2021 versus 15 February 2012 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 20.80 GTexel/s versus 40 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 125 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.179 versus 33.836 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 543.594 versus 506.712 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition
- 2.5x plus de pipelines: 640 versus 256
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2174 versus 1724
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 462 versus 364
- 2.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 14263 versus 6447
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.01 versus 1.995
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.787 versus 29.322
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3707 versus 2899
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4524 versus 3219
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 14630 versus 11068
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3707 versus 2899
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4524 versus 3219
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 14630 versus 11068
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 711 versus 641
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 640 versus 256 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2174 versus 1724 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 462 versus 364 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14263 versus 6447 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.01 versus 1.995 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.787 versus 29.322 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3707 versus 2899 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4524 versus 3219 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 14630 versus 11068 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3707 versus 2899 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4524 versus 3219 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 14630 versus 11068 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 711 versus 641 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 750
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1724 | 2174 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 364 | 462 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6447 | 14263 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.179 | 33.836 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 543.594 | 506.712 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.995 | 3.01 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.322 | 49.787 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2899 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3219 | 4524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 | 14630 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2899 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3219 | 4524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 | 14630 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 641 | 711 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 153.657 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics 750 | AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | Rocket Lake GT1 | Cape Verde |
| Date de sortie | 2021 | 15 February 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 748 | 557 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $159 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 32 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 166.4 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1331 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 665.6 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 256 | 640 |
| Pixel fill rate | 10.40 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 20.80 GTexel/s | 40 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 125 Watt |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,280 gflops | |
| Stream Processors | 640 | |
| Compte de transistor | 1,500 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Longeur | 210 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 72 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1125 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics 750 avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5100
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6700 XL
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
ATIRadeon X1050
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
ATIRadeon HD 5850
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
NVIDIATesla C2070
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
IntelIris Pro Graphics P580
