Intel UHD Graphics 750 vs AMD Radeon R9 350
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 750 and AMD Radeon R9 350 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 6.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 95 Watt
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2899 vs 2609
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11068 vs 9664
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2899 vs 2609
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11068 vs 9664
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2021 vs 12 June 2015 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 95 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2899 vs 2609 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 vs 9664 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2899 vs 2609 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 vs 9664 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 350
- 3.1x more core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 3x more pipelines: 768 vs 256
- Around 50% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10008 vs 6684
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3911 vs 3219
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3911 vs 3219
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 256 |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10008 vs 6684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3911 vs 3219 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3911 vs 3219 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 750
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 350
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | AMD Radeon R9 350 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1737 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 348 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6684 | 10008 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2899 | 2609 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3219 | 3911 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 | 9664 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2899 | 2609 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3219 | 3911 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 | 9664 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 641 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics 750 | AMD Radeon R9 350 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Tobago |
| Code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | |
| Launch date | 2021 | 12 June 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 595 | 600 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
| Compute units | 32 | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 166.4 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1331 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 665.6 GFLOPS | 1421 GFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 256 | 768 |
| Pixel fill rate | 10.40 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 20.80 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 95 Watt |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2 x DisplayPort, DVI |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel UHD Graphics 750 with others
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7800 GT
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
ATIFireMV 2400 PCIe x1
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 555 OEM
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 945A
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P600
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
NVIDIAT1000
