Intel UHD Graphics 750 vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 750 and Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 750

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 25 Watt
  • Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 364 vs 311
  • 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11068 vs 3214
  • 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11068 vs 3214
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 2021 vs 31 Oct 2020
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 25 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 364 vs 311
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 11068 vs 3214
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 11068 vs 3214

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX

  • Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1300 MHz
  • 3.8x more texture fill rate: 79.20 GTexel/s vs 20.80 GTexel/s
  • 3x more pipelines: 768 vs 256
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
  • Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1972 vs 1724
  • 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14238 vs 6447
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6889 vs 2899
  • Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3462 vs 3219
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6889 vs 2899
  • Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3462 vs 3219
Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed 1650 MHz vs 1300 MHz
Texture fill rate 79.20 GTexel/s vs 20.80 GTexel/s
Pipelines 768 vs 256
Manufacturing process technology 10 nm vs 14 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1972 vs 1724
Geekbench - OpenCL 14238 vs 6447
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 6889 vs 2899
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3462 vs 3219
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 6889 vs 2899
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3462 vs 3219

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 750
GPU 2: Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1724
1972
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
364
311
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
6447
14238
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2899
6889
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3219
3462
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
11068
3214
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2899
6889
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3219
3462
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
11068
3214
Name Intel UHD Graphics 750 Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
PassMark - G3D Mark 1724 1972
PassMark - G2D Mark 364 311
Geekbench - OpenCL 6447 14238
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 35.179
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 543.594
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.995
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 29.322
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2899 6889
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3219 3462
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 11068 3214
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2899 6889
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3219 3462
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 11068 3214
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 641

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel UHD Graphics 750 Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX

Essentials

Architecture Generation 12.1 Generation 12.1
Code name Rocket Lake GT1 DG1
Launch date 2021 31 Oct 2020
Place in performance rating 748 523
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1300 MHz 1650 MHz
Compute units 32 96
Core clock speed 300 MHz 300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 10 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 166.4 GFLOPS (1:4) 633.6 GFLOPS (1:4)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 1331 GFLOPS (2:1) 5.069 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 665.6 GFLOPS 2.534 TFLOPS
Pipelines 256 768
Pixel fill rate 10.40 GPixel/s 39.60 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 20.80 GTexel/s 79.20 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 25 Watt

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.1
OpenCL 3.0 2.1
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4 6.4
Vulkan

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 4.0 x4
Width IGP

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 68.26 GB/s
Memory bus width 128 bit
Memory clock speed 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective)
Memory type LPDDR4X