Intel UHD Graphics 750 vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 750 and Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 25 Watt
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 364 vs 311
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11068 vs 3214
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11068 vs 3214
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2021 vs 31 Oct 2020 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 25 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 364 vs 311 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 vs 3214 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 vs 3214 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
- Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1300 MHz
- 3.8x more texture fill rate: 79.20 GTexel/s vs 20.80 GTexel/s
- 3x more pipelines: 768 vs 256
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1972 vs 1724
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14238 vs 6447
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6889 vs 2899
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3462 vs 3219
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6889 vs 2899
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3462 vs 3219
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 1300 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 79.20 GTexel/s vs 20.80 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 256 |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 14 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1972 vs 1724 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14238 vs 6447 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6889 vs 2899 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3462 vs 3219 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6889 vs 2899 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3462 vs 3219 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 750
GPU 2: Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1724 | 1972 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 364 | 311 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6447 | 14238 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.179 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 543.594 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.995 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.322 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2899 | 6889 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3219 | 3462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 | 3214 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2899 | 6889 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3219 | 3462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 | 3214 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 641 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 750 | Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Generation 12.1 |
Code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | DG1 |
Launch date | 2021 | 31 Oct 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 748 | 523 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1650 MHz |
Compute units | 32 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 10 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 166.4 GFLOPS (1:4) | 633.6 GFLOPS (1:4) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1331 GFLOPS (2:1) | 5.069 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 665.6 GFLOPS | 2.534 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 256 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 10.40 GPixel/s | 39.60 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 20.80 GTexel/s | 79.20 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 25 Watt |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | |
Width | IGP | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 68.26 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) | |
Memory type | LPDDR4X |