Intel UHD Graphics 750 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 750 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Soutien API, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 750
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 12 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 26% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1300 MHz versus 1033 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 20.80 GTexel/s versus 78.4 billion / sec
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 9.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 140 Watt
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 35.179 versus 30.505
- 3.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11068 versus 3365
- 3.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11068 versus 3365
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2021 versus 6 September 2012 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz versus 1033 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 20.80 GTexel/s versus 78.4 billion / sec |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 140 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.179 versus 30.505 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 versus 3365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 versus 3365 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- 3.3x plus de vitesse du noyau: 980 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 3.8x plus de pipelines: 960 versus 256
- 2.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4014 versus 1727
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 484 versus 359
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11372 versus 6464
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 705.293 versus 543.594
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.085 versus 1.995
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.416 versus 29.322
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3581 versus 2899
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 versus 3219
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3581 versus 2899
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 versus 3219
- 2x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1307 versus 641
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 960 versus 256 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4014 versus 1727 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 484 versus 359 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11372 versus 6464 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.293 versus 543.594 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.085 versus 1.995 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.416 versus 29.322 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3581 versus 2899 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 versus 3219 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3581 versus 2899 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 versus 3219 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1307 versus 641 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1727 | 4014 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 359 | 484 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6464 | 11372 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.179 | 30.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 543.594 | 705.293 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.995 | 3.085 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.322 | 35.416 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2899 | 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3219 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 | 3365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2899 | 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3219 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 | 3365 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 641 | 1307 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 62.69 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics 750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Rocket Lake GT1 | GK106 |
| Date de sortie | 2021 | 6 September 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 760 | 757 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | |
| Prix maintenant | $349.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.35 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 32 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 166.4 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1331 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 665.6 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 256 | 960 |
| Pixel fill rate | 10.40 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 20.80 GTexel/s | 78.4 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 140 Watt |
| Noyaux CUDA | 960 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,981 gflops | |
| Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Longeur | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 6-pin | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 144.2 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192-bit GDDR5 | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6.0 GB/s | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics 750 avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4290 IGP
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 480
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960M
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
AMDRadeon 630
