Intel UHD Graphics 750 vs NVIDIA Quadro P400

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 750 and NVIDIA Quadro P400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 750

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1252 MHz
• 978.8x more texture fill rate: 20.80 GTexel/s vs 21.25 GTexel / s
• 2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
• Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1724 vs 1651
• 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6447 vs 3053
• Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 35.179 vs 19.856
• Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 543.594 vs 309.824
• Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.995 vs 1.38
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 29.322 vs 25.011
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2899 vs 2709
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3219 vs 2875
• 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11068 vs 3328
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2899 vs 2709
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3219 vs 2875
• 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11068 vs 3328
• Around 4% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 641 vs 617

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P400

• 4.1x more core clock speed: 1228 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 435 vs 364

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 750
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P400

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1724 1651
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	364 435
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6447 3053
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	35.179 19.856
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	543.594 309.824
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.995 1.38
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.322 25.011
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2899 2709
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3219 2875
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11068 3328
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2899 2709
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3219 2875
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11068 3328
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	641 617

Compare specifications (specs)