NVIDIA GRID K1 vs AMD Radeon HD 6480G
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID K1 and AMD Radeon HD 6480G videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K1
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 91% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 444 MHz
- 3.2x more pipelines: 4x 192 vs 240
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 651 vs 257
- 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 259 vs 81
- 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1976 vs 673
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1237 vs 592
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1237 vs 592
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 March 2013 vs 15 June 2011 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 444 MHz |
Pipelines | 4x 192 vs 240 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 651 vs 257 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 259 vs 81 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1976 vs 673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1237 vs 592 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1237 vs 592 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6480G
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1082 vs 354
- 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1696 vs 319
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1082 vs 354
- 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1696 vs 319
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1082 vs 354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1696 vs 319 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1082 vs 354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1696 vs 319 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K1
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6480G
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GRID K1 | AMD Radeon HD 6480G |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 651 | 257 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 259 | 81 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1976 | 673 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.591 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 169.864 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.336 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.734 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 10.43 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1237 | 592 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 354 | 1082 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 319 | 1696 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1237 | 592 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 354 | 1082 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 319 | 1696 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GRID K1 | AMD Radeon HD 6480G | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Terascale 2 |
Code name | GK107 | Llano |
Launch date | 18 March 2013 | 15 June 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $4,140 | |
Place in performance rating | 1525 | 1528 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 444 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 4x 326.4 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm |
Pipelines | 4x 192 | 240 |
Texture fill rate | 4x 13.6 GTexel / s billion / sec | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1000 Million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4x 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 4x 28.51 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 4x 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Shared memory | 1 |