NVIDIA GRID K160Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID K160Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GRID K160Q

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

4.1x more texture fill rate: 55.23 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s
4x more pipelines: 768 vs 192
4.1x better floating-point performance: 1,326 gflops vs 326.4 gflops
Around 73% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 130 Watt
2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
Around 12% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1782 MHz
3.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1995 vs 628
Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 289 vs 262
2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3188 vs 1237
2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3188 vs 1237
Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3275 vs 1871
Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3275 vs 1871
Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 vs 2654
Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 vs 2654

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	55.23 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines	768 vs 192
Floating-point performance	1,326 gflops vs 326.4 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt vs 130 Watt
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz vs 1782 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1995 vs 628
PassMark - G2D Mark	289 vs 262
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3188 vs 1237
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3188 vs 1237
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3275 vs 1871
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3275 vs 1871
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3333 vs 2654
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3333 vs 2654

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K160Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

628

1995

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

262

289

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1237

3188

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1237

3188

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1871

3275

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1871

3275

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2654

3333

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2654

3333

Name	NVIDIA GRID K160Q	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
PassMark - G3D Mark	628	1995
PassMark - G2D Mark	262	289
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1237	3188
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1237	3188
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1871	3275
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1871	3275
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2654	3333
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2654	3333
Geekbench - OpenCL		7107
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		8.832
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		520.747
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		0.731
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		19.952
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		43.535
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		759

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GRID K160Q	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Code name	GK107	GK106
Launch date	28 June 2013	30 May 2013
Launch price (MSRP)	$125
Place in performance rating	1046	1047
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Technical info
Core clock speed	850 MHz	850 MHz
Floating-point performance	326.4 gflops	1,326 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	192	768
Texture fill rate	13.6 GTexel / s	55.23 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	130 Watt	75 Watt
Transistor count	1,270 million	2,540 million
Boost clock speed		863 MHz
CUDA cores		768
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support		Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support		Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support		Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support		Up to 2048x1536
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
Laptop size		large
SLI options		1
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12 API
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL		1.1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB / s	64.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Standard memory configuration		GDDR5
Technologies
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Blu-Ray 3D Support
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
SLI
TXAA
Verde Drivers