NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 and NVIDIA GRID K160Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650

NVIDIA GRID K160Q

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
Around 24% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 850 MHz
2.5x more texture fill rate: 33.9 billion / sec vs 13.6 GTexel / s
2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
2.5x better floating-point performance: 812.5 gflops vs 326.4 gflops
2x lower typical power consumption: 64 Watt vs 130 Watt
2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1750 vs 628
Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 361 vs 262
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2663 vs 1237
Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3478 vs 1871
Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3332 vs 2654
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2663 vs 1237
Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3478 vs 1871
Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3332 vs 2654

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 November 2013 vs 28 June 2013
Core clock speed	1058 MHz vs 850 MHz
Texture fill rate	33.9 billion / sec vs 13.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines	384 vs 192
Floating-point performance	812.5 gflops vs 326.4 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	64 Watt vs 130 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1750 vs 628
PassMark - G2D Mark	361 vs 262
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2663 vs 1237
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3478 vs 1871
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3332 vs 2654
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2663 vs 1237
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3478 vs 1871
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3332 vs 2654

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K160Q

356.4x more memory clock speed: 1782 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s

Memory clock speed	1782 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K160Q

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1750

628

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

361

262

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2663

1237

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3478

1871

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3332

2654

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2663

1237

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3478

1871

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3332

2654

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650	NVIDIA GRID K160Q
PassMark - G3D Mark	1750	628
PassMark - G2D Mark	361	262
Geekbench - OpenCL	4493
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	12.582
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	364.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.254
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	18.386
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	23.499
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2663	1237
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3478	1871
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3332	2654
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2663	1237
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3478	1871
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3332	2654
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	545

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650	NVIDIA GRID K160Q
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Code name	GK106	GK107
Launch date	27 November 2013	28 June 2013
Launch price (MSRP)	$109	$125
Place in performance rating	1043	1044
Price now	$144.81
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Value for money (0-100)	16.05
Technical info
Core clock speed	1058 MHz	850 MHz
CUDA cores	384
Floating-point performance	812.5 gflops	326.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	384	192
Texture fill rate	33.9 billion / sec	13.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	64 Watt	130 Watt
Transistor count	2,540 million	1,270 million
Video outputs and ports
Audio input for HDMI	Internal
Display Connectors	One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0
Height	4.38" (11.1 cm)
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	5.70" (14.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectors	One 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.3	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	80.0 GB / s	28.51 GB / s
Memory bus width	128-bit GDDR5	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5.0 GB/s	1782 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Technologies
3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
3D Vision
Adaptive VSync
CUDA
FXAA
TXAA