NVIDIA GRID K2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GRID K2 und NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GRID K2
- 7.5x mehr Texturfüllrate: 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 39.55 GTexel / s
- 5.3x mehr Leitungssysteme: 2x 1536 vs 576
- 4.8x bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 2x 2,289 gflops vs 949.2 gflops
- 8x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 2x 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Etwa 25% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 5000 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- Etwa 45% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2737 vs 1882
- 2x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10550 vs 5238
- Etwa 37% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.948 vs 13.806
- Etwa 77% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 968.568 vs 546.51
- Etwa 68% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.58 vs 1.535
- Etwa 20% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.988 vs 27.524
- 3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 114.144 vs 38.664
- 4.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6371 vs 1435
- 4.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6371 vs 1435
Spezifikationen | |
Texturfüllrate | 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 39.55 GTexel / s |
Leitungssysteme | 2x 1536 vs 576 |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 2x 2,289 gflops vs 949.2 gflops |
Maximale Speichergröße | 2x 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 5000 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2737 vs 1882 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10550 vs 5238 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.948 vs 13.806 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 968.568 vs 546.51 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.58 vs 1.535 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.988 vs 27.524 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 114.144 vs 38.664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6371 vs 1435 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6371 vs 1435 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM
- Etwa 11% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:824 MHz vs 745 MHz
- 3.5x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 65 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Etwa 35% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 431 vs 319
- 10.3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3531 vs 344
- 10.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3300 vs 312
- 10.3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3531 vs 344
- 10.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3300 vs 312
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 824 MHz vs 745 MHz |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 431 vs 319 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3531 vs 344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3300 vs 312 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3531 vs 344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3300 vs 312 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K2
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GRID K2 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2737 | 1882 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 319 | 431 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10550 | 5238 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.948 | 13.806 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 968.568 | 546.51 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.58 | 1.535 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.988 | 27.524 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 114.144 | 38.664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6371 | 1435 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 344 | 3531 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 312 | 3300 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6371 | 1435 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 344 | 3531 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 312 | 3300 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GRID K2 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Kepler | Kepler |
Codename | GK104 | GK106 |
Startdatum | 11 May 2013 | 22 April 2013 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $5,199 | |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 975 | 976 |
Typ | Workstation | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
Kerntaktfrequenz | 745 MHz | 824 MHz |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 2x 2,289 gflops | 949.2 gflops |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 2x 1536 | 576 |
Texturfüllrate | 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec | 39.55 GTexel / s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 225 Watt | 65 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 3,540 million | 2,540 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 267 mm | 147 mm |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 8-pin | None |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 2x 4 GB | 1 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 2x 160.0 GB / s | 64 GB / s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 2x 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 5000 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Speichertyp | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |