NVIDIA GRID K520 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GRID K520 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GRID K520
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 102.0 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 2x 1536 versus 1536
- 2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2x 2,448 gflops versus 2,448 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2x 4 GB versus 4 GB
- 2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5000 MHz versus 2500 MHz
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1063.784 versus 705.616
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 42.277 versus 13.832
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6782 versus 4868
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 versus 3679
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6782 versus 4868
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 versus 3679
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 23 July 2013 versus 11 May 2013 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 102.0 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2x 1536 versus 1536 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2x 2,448 gflops versus 2,448 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2x 4 GB versus 4 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz versus 2500 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1063.784 versus 705.616 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.277 versus 13.832 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6782 versus 4868 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 versus 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 versus 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6782 versus 4868 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 versus 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 versus 3351 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
- Environ 10% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 823 MHz versus 745 MHz
- Environ 84% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 122 Watt versus 225 Watt
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3804 versus 3516
- 2.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 422 versus 160
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 12815 versus 10864
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 39.934 versus 20.97
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.631 versus 3.244
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 78.867 versus 76.158
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 823 MHz versus 745 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt versus 225 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3804 versus 3516 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 422 versus 160 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12815 versus 10864 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.934 versus 20.97 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.631 versus 3.244 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 78.867 versus 76.158 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K520
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GRID K520 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3516 | 3804 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 160 | 422 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10864 | 12815 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.97 | 39.934 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1063.784 | 705.616 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.244 | 3.631 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.277 | 13.832 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 76.158 | 78.867 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6782 | 4868 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6782 | 4868 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3351 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1466 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GRID K520 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GK104 | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 23 July 2013 | 11 May 2013 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $3,599 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 762 | 764 |
| Genre | Workstation | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 745 MHz | 823 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2x 2,448 gflops | 2,448 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2x 1536 | 1536 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec | 102.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 122 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 3,540 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 797 MHz | |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Options SLI | 1 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2x 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 2x 160.0 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 2x 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GRID K520 avec des autres
NVIDIAGRID K520 vs
ATIRadeon X600 SE
NVIDIAGRID K520 vs
ATIRadeon HD 5850
NVIDIAGRID K520 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M
NVIDIAGRID K520 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M
NVIDIAGRID K520 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M470
NVIDIAGRID K520 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P520
