NVIDIA GRID K520 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID K520 and NVIDIA Quadro K5100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K520
- 21.3x more texture fill rate: 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 98.69 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 1536
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 2x 2,448 gflops vs 2,369 gflops
- Around 39% higher memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 3600 MHz
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3516 vs 3163
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 20.97 vs 5.972
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1063.784 vs 355.305
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.244 vs 1.022
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 42.277 vs 15.706
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 76.158 vs 34.772
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6782 vs 6747
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6782 vs 6747
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 98.69 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 1536 vs 1536 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops vs 2,369 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 3600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3516 vs 3163 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.97 vs 5.972 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1063.784 vs 355.305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.244 vs 1.022 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.277 vs 15.706 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 76.158 vs 34.772 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6782 vs 6747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6782 vs 6747 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 771 MHz vs 745 MHz
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 225 Watt
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 363 vs 160
- Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11751 vs 10864
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 771 MHz vs 745 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 363 vs 160 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11751 vs 10864 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 vs 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 vs 3354 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K520
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GRID K520 | NVIDIA Quadro K5100M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3516 | 3163 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 160 | 363 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10864 | 11751 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.97 | 5.972 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1063.784 | 355.305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.244 | 1.022 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.277 | 15.706 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 76.158 | 34.772 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6782 | 6747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6782 | 6747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3362 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GRID K520 | NVIDIA Quadro K5100M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Code name | GK104 | GK104 |
Launch date | 23 July 2013 | 23 July 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $3,599 | |
Place in performance rating | 763 | 764 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Price now | $309.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.80 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 771 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | 2,369 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2x 1536 | 1536 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec | 98.69 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 160.0 GB / s | 115.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2x 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |