NVIDIA GeForce 610M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 610M and NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 610M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 5.6x more core clock speed: 672 MHz vs 120 MHz
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 48 vs 32
- Around 61% better floating-point performance: 129.02 gflops vs 80 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 92% lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 23 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 292 vs 137
- 3.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 111 vs 29
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1602 vs 1140
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2848 vs 1679
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1602 vs 1140
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2848 vs 1679
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 December 2011 vs 4 June 2008 |
Core clock speed | 672 MHz vs 120 MHz |
Pipelines | 48 vs 32 |
Floating-point performance | 129.02 gflops vs 80 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt vs 23 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 292 vs 137 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 111 vs 29 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1602 vs 1140 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2848 vs 1679 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1602 vs 1140 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2848 vs 1679 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 610M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 610M | NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 292 | 137 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 111 | 29 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1372 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.747 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 104.498 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.27 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.832 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 9.69 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 664 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1602 | 1140 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2848 | 1679 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 664 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1602 | 1140 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2848 | 1679 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 610M | NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Tesla |
Code name | GF108 | G96 |
Launch date | 1 December 2011 | 4 June 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1522 | 1525 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 672 MHz | 120 MHz |
CUDA cores | 48 | 32 |
Floating-point performance | 129.02 gflops | 80 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 32 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt | 23 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 314 million |
Video decoders | H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p | |
Texture fill rate | 8 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-II |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bus width | 64bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
Optimus | ||
PCI-E 2.0 |