NVIDIA GeForce 710M vs Intel HD Graphics 4000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 710M and Intel HD Graphics 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 710M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 11% higher core clock speed: 719 MHz vs 650 MHz
• 3x more texture fill rate: 12.4 GTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s
• 6x more pipelines: 96 vs 16
• 8.9x better floating-point performance: 297.6 gflops vs 33.6 gflops
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
• Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 454 vs 347
• 4.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2457 vs 538
• Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.718 vs 7.36
• Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 19.855 vs 12.009
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1030 vs 754
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3075 vs 1492
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3325 vs 2392
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1030 vs 754
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3075 vs 1492
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3325 vs 2392

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000

• Around 31% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 800 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 194 vs 125
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.712 vs 6.51
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 155.638 vs 148.156
• Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.931 vs 0.577

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 710M
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	454 347
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	125 194
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2457 538
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.51 8.712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	148.156 155.638
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.577 0.931
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.718 7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.855 12.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1030 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3075 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3325 2392
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1030 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3075 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3325 2392

Compare specifications (specs)