NVIDIA GeForce 710M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 710M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 710M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 7% higher core clock speed: 719 MHz vs 672 MHz
• Around 15% higher texture fill rate: 12.4 GTexel / s vs 10.8 billion / sec
• Around 15% better floating-point performance: 297.6 gflops vs 258.05 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
• 2x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 900 MHz
• Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 125 vs 91
• Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2457 vs 2171
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.51 vs 4.85
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.577 vs 0.561
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.718 vs 9.109
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 19.855 vs 16.727
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1030 vs 960
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3075 vs 2210
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3325 vs 2701
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1030 vs 960
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3075 vs 2210
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3325 vs 2701

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M

• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 478 vs 454
• Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 195.796 vs 148.156

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 710M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	454 478
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	125 91
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2457 2171
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.51 4.85
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	148.156 195.796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.577 0.561
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.718 9.109
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.855 16.727
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1030 960
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3075 2210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3325 2701
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1030 960
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3075 2210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3325 2701

Compare specifications (specs)