NVIDIA GeForce 710M vs NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 710M and NVIDIA Quadro K1000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 710M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
- Around 44% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2467 vs 1715
- Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.51 vs 4.636
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 148.156 vs 115.549
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.577 vs 0.454
- Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.718 vs 7.024
- Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 19.855 vs 10.485
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3075 vs 1695
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3325 vs 2297
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3075 vs 1695
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3325 vs 2297
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 24 July 2013 vs 1 June 2012 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 45 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2467 vs 1715 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.51 vs 4.636 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 148.156 vs 115.549 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.577 vs 0.454 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.718 vs 7.024 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.855 vs 10.485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3075 vs 1695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 vs 2297 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3075 vs 1695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 vs 2297 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 719 MHz
- Around 10% higher texture fill rate: 13.6 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 192 vs 96
- Around 10% better floating-point performance: 326.4 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 780 vs 460
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 250 vs 125
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1162 vs 1030
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1162 vs 1030
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 719 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 13.6 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 192 vs 96 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops vs 297.6 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 780 vs 460 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 250 vs 125 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1162 vs 1030 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1162 vs 1030 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 710M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 710M | NVIDIA Quadro K1000M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 460 | 780 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 125 | 250 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2467 | 1715 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.51 | 4.636 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 148.156 | 115.549 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.577 | 0.454 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.718 | 7.024 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.855 | 10.485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1030 | 1162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3075 | 1695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 | 2297 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1030 | 1162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3075 | 1695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 | 2297 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 710M | NVIDIA Quadro K1000M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | GK208 | GK107 |
| Launch date | 24 July 2013 | 1 June 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 1399 | 1401 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $119.90 | |
| Price now | $149.90 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 6.18 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 719 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 96 | 192 |
| Texture fill rate | 12.4 GTexel / s | 13.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Transistor count | 585 million | 1,270 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 2560x1600 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 2560x1600 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
| Standard memory configuration | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce 710M with others
NVIDIAGeForce 710M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630M
NVIDIAGeForce 710M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K1000M
NVIDIAGeForce 710M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 625 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce 710M vs
AMDRadeon R7 Mobile Graphics
NVIDIAGeForce 710M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 710A
NVIDIAGeForce 710M vs
AMDRadeon R7 M340
