NVIDIA GeForce 710M vs NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 710M and NVIDIA Quadro K1000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 710M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
• Around 42% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2442 vs 1719
• Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.51 vs 4.636
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 148.156 vs 115.549
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.577 vs 0.454
• Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.718 vs 7.024
• Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 19.855 vs 10.485
• Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3075 vs 1695
• Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3325 vs 2297
• Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3075 vs 1695
• Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3325 vs 2297

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

• Around 18% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 719 MHz
• Around 10% higher texture fill rate: 13.6 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 192 vs 96
• Around 10% better floating-point performance: 326.4 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 778 vs 459
• Around 99% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 249 vs 125
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1162 vs 1030
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1162 vs 1030

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 710M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	459 778
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	125 249
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2442 1719
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.51 4.636
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	148.156 115.549
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.577 0.454
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.718 7.024
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.855 10.485
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1030 1162
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3075 1695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3325 2297
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1030 1162
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3075 1695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3325 2297

Compare specifications (specs)