NVIDIA GeForce 710M vs NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 710M and NVIDIA Quadro K1000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 710M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
- Around 42% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2445 vs 1717
- Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.51 vs 4.636
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 148.156 vs 115.549
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.577 vs 0.454
- Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.718 vs 7.024
- Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 19.855 vs 10.485
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3075 vs 1695
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3325 vs 2297
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3075 vs 1695
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3325 vs 2297
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 24 July 2013 vs 1 June 2012 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2445 vs 1717 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.51 vs 4.636 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 148.156 vs 115.549 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.577 vs 0.454 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.718 vs 7.024 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.855 vs 10.485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3075 vs 1695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 vs 2297 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3075 vs 1695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 vs 2297 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 719 MHz
- Around 10% higher texture fill rate: 13.6 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 192 vs 96
- Around 10% better floating-point performance: 326.4 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 779 vs 459
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 250 vs 125
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1162 vs 1030
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1162 vs 1030
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 719 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 13.6 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 192 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops vs 297.6 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 779 vs 459 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 250 vs 125 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1162 vs 1030 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1162 vs 1030 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 710M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 710M | NVIDIA Quadro K1000M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 459 | 779 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 125 | 250 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2445 | 1717 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.51 | 4.636 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 148.156 | 115.549 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.577 | 0.454 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.718 | 7.024 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.855 | 10.485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1030 | 1162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3075 | 1695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 | 2297 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1030 | 1162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3075 | 1695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 | 2297 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 710M | NVIDIA Quadro K1000M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GK208 | GK107 |
Launch date | 24 July 2013 | 1 June 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1399 | 1402 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $119.90 | |
Price now | $149.90 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 6.18 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 719 MHz | 850 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 12.4 GTexel / s | 13.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 1,270 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 2560x1600 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 2560x1600 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus |