NVIDIA GeForce 820M vs NVIDIA GeForce 710M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 820M and NVIDIA GeForce 710M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 820M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 13% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 719 MHz
• Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 490 vs 454
• Around 14% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2789 vs 2457
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.765 vs 6.51
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 161.305 vs 148.156
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.686 vs 0.577
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 14.257 vs 11.718
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 22.768 vs 19.855
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1195 vs 1030
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 vs 3325
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1195 vs 1030
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 3325

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 710M

• Around 24% higher texture fill rate: 12.4 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s
• Around 24% better floating-point performance: 297.6 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 125 vs 114
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3075 vs 1447
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3075 vs 1447

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 820M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 710M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	490 454
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	114 125
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2789 2457
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7.765 6.51
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	161.305 148.156
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.686 0.577
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14.257 11.718
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22.768 19.855
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1195 1030
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1447 3075
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3349 3325
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1195 1030
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1447 3075
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3349 3325

Compare specifications (specs)