NVIDIA GeForce 820M versus NVIDIA GeForce 710M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 820M and NVIDIA GeForce 710M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 820M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 13% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 810 MHz versus 719 MHz
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 490 versus 454
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2789 versus 2457
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.765 versus 6.51
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 161.305 versus 148.156
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.686 versus 0.577
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 14.257 versus 11.718
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 22.768 versus 19.855
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1195 versus 1030
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 versus 3325
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1195 versus 1030
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 versus 3325
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 21 March 2015 versus 24 July 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz versus 719 MHz |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1802 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 490 versus 454 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2789 versus 2457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.765 versus 6.51 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 161.305 versus 148.156 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.686 versus 0.577 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.257 versus 11.718 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.768 versus 19.855 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1195 versus 1030 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 versus 3325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1195 versus 1030 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 versus 3325 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 710M
- Environ 24% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 12.4 GTexel / s versus 10 GTexel / s
- Environ 24% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 297.6 gflops versus 240.0 gflops
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 45 Watt
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 125 versus 114
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3075 versus 1447
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3075 versus 1447
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.4 GTexel / s versus 10 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 297.6 gflops versus 240.0 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 45 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 125 versus 114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3075 versus 1447 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3075 versus 1447 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 820M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 710M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 820M | NVIDIA GeForce 710M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 490 | 454 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 114 | 125 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2789 | 2457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.765 | 6.51 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 161.305 | 148.156 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.686 | 0.577 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.257 | 11.718 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.768 | 19.855 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1195 | 1030 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1447 | 3075 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 3325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1195 | 1030 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1447 | 3075 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 3325 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 847 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce 820M | NVIDIA GeForce 710M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GK107 | GK208 |
| Date de sortie | 21 March 2015 | 24 July 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1444 | 1387 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz | 719 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 240.0 gflops | 297.6 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 96 | 96 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 10 GTexel / s | 12.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | 585 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 800 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 2560x1600 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 2560x1600 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | PCI Express 2.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1802 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
| Verde Drivers | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce 820M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce 820M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8300
NVIDIAGeForce 820M vs
NVIDIAQuadro NVS 450
NVIDIAGeForce 820M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 435M
NVIDIAGeForce 820M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K1100M
NVIDIAGeForce 820M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
NVIDIAGeForce 820M vs
AMDRadeon R5 M230
