NVIDIA GeForce 820M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 430

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 820M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 820M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 49 Watt
• 2x more memory clock speed: 1802 MHz vs 800 - 900 MHz (1600 - 1800 data rate)
• Around 25% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2789 vs 2223
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.765 vs 3.396
• Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 161.305 vs 87.094
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.686 vs 0.243
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 14.257 vs 5.005
• 6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 22.768 vs 3.764
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1195 vs 1080
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 vs 1624
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1195 vs 1080
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 1624

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 430

• Around 73% higher core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 810 MHz
• Around 12% higher texture fill rate: 11.2 billion / sec vs 10 GTexel / s
• Around 12% better floating-point performance: 268.8 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
• Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 603 vs 490
• Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 205 vs 114
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1713 vs 1447
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1713 vs 1447

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 820M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 430

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	490 603
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	114 205
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2789 2223
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7.765 3.396
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	161.305 87.094
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.686 0.243
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14.257 5.005
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22.768 3.764
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1195 1080
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1447 1713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3349 1624
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1195 1080
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1447 1713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3349 1624

Compare specifications (specs)