NVIDIA GeForce 820M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 820M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 820M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 9% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 49 Watt
- 2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1802 MHz versus 800 - 900 MHz (1600 - 1800 data rate)
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2789 versus 2223
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.765 versus 3.396
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 161.305 versus 87.094
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.686 versus 0.243
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 14.257 versus 5.005
- 6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 22.768 versus 3.764
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1195 versus 1080
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 versus 1624
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1195 versus 1080
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 versus 1624
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 21 March 2015 versus 11 October 2010 |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 49 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1802 MHz versus 800 - 900 MHz (1600 - 1800 data rate) |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2789 versus 2223 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.765 versus 3.396 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 161.305 versus 87.094 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.686 versus 0.243 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.257 versus 5.005 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.768 versus 3.764 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1195 versus 1080 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 versus 1624 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1195 versus 1080 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 versus 1624 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
- Environ 73% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1400 MHz versus 810 MHz
- Environ 12% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 11.2 billion / sec versus 10 GTexel / s
- Environ 12% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 268.8 gflops versus 240.0 gflops
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 603 versus 490
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 205 versus 114
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1713 versus 1447
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1713 versus 1447
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1400 MHz versus 810 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 11.2 billion / sec versus 10 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 268.8 gflops versus 240.0 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 603 versus 490 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 205 versus 114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1713 versus 1447 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1713 versus 1447 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 820M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 820M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 490 | 603 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 114 | 205 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2789 | 2223 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.765 | 3.396 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 161.305 | 87.094 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.686 | 0.243 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.257 | 5.005 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.768 | 3.764 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1195 | 1080 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1447 | 1713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 1624 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1195 | 1080 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1447 | 1713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 1624 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 847 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce 820M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Nom de code | GK107 | GF108 |
| Date de sortie | 21 March 2015 | 11 October 2010 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1444 | 1505 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $79 | |
| Prix maintenant | $35.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 20.89 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 240.0 gflops | 268.8 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 96 | 96 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 10 GTexel / s | 11.2 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 49 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | 585 million |
| Noyaux CUDA par GPU | 96 | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 98 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, HDMIVGA (optional)Mini HDMIDual Link DVI |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Hauteur | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
| Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 25.6 - 28.8 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1802 MHz | 800 - 900 MHz (1600 - 1800 data rate) |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
| Verde Drivers | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce 820M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce 820M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8300
NVIDIAGeForce 820M vs
NVIDIAQuadro NVS 450
NVIDIAGeForce 820M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 435M
NVIDIAGeForce 820M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K1100M
NVIDIAGeForce 820M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
NVIDIAGeForce 820M vs
AMDRadeon R5 M230
