NVIDIA GeForce 820M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 820M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 820M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 21% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 672 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2x more memory clock speed: 1802 MHz vs 900 MHz
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 490 vs 478
• Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 114 vs 91
• Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2789 vs 2171
• Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.765 vs 4.85
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.686 vs 0.561
• Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 14.257 vs 9.109
• Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 22.768 vs 16.727
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1195 vs 960
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 vs 2701
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1195 vs 960
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 2701

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M

• Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 10.8 billion / sec vs 10 GTexel / s
• Around 8% better floating-point performance: 258.05 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
• Around 29% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 45 Watt
• Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 195.796 vs 161.305
• Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2210 vs 1447
• Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2210 vs 1447

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 820M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	490 478
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	114 91
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2789 2171
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7.765 4.85
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	161.305 195.796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.686 0.561
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14.257 9.109
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22.768 16.727
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1195 960
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1447 2210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3349 2701
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1195 960
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1447 2210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3349 2701

Compare specifications (specs)