NVIDIA GeForce 825M vs NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 825M and NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 825M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 48% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 574 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 6.8x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 225 Watt
Launch date | 27 January 2014 vs 25 July 2011 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 574 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q
- Around 7% higher texture fill rate: 32.1 GTexel / s vs 30.11 GTexel / s
- Around 17% higher pipelines: 448 vs 384
- Around 42% better floating-point performance: 1,027.7 gflops vs 722.7 gflops
- 6x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 74% higher memory clock speed: 3132 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1306 vs 782
- Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 444 vs 247
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 32.1 GTexel / s vs 30.11 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 448 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops vs 722.7 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 3132 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1306 vs 782 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 vs 247 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 825M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 825M | NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 782 | 1306 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 247 | 444 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15796 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.784 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 917.512 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.125 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.227 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 93.533 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 825M | NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | GK208 | GF100 |
Launch date | 27 January 2014 | 25 July 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 787 | 789 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $5,489 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 941 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 574 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 722.7 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 448 |
Texture fill rate | 30.11 GTexel / s | 32.1 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 1300 Million | 3,100 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 248 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 150.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 3132 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |