NVIDIA GeForce 840M versus AMD Radeon HD 7570
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 840M and AMD Radeon HD 7570 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 840M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 58% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1029 MHz versus 650 MHz
- Environ 15% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 17.98 GTexel / s versus 15.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 38% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 863.2 gflops versus 624 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 82% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 33 Watt versus 60 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 25% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2002 MHz versus 1600 MHz
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1096 versus 611
- 3.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5745 versus 1548
- 4.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.848 versus 4.874
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.237 versus 0.487
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.15 versus 14.033
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 95.545 versus 57.396
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2085 versus 1389
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2085 versus 1389
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 versus 5 January 2012 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1029 MHz versus 650 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 17.98 GTexel / s versus 15.6 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 863.2 gflops versus 624 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt versus 60 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2002 MHz versus 1600 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1096 versus 611 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5745 versus 1548 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.848 versus 4.874 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.237 versus 0.487 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.15 versus 14.033 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 95.545 versus 57.396 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2085 versus 1389 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2736 versus 2724 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2085 versus 1389 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2736 versus 2724 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7570
- Environ 25% de pipelines plus haut: 480 versus 384
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 257 versus 151
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 259.769 versus 162.594
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 versus 3191
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 versus 3191
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 480 versus 384 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 257 versus 151 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 259.769 versus 162.594 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 3191 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 3191 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 840M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7570
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 840M | AMD Radeon HD 7570 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1096 | 611 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 151 | 257 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5745 | 1548 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.848 | 4.874 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 162.594 | 259.769 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.237 | 0.487 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.15 | 14.033 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 95.545 | 57.396 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2085 | 1389 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2736 | 2724 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3191 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2085 | 1389 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2736 | 2724 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3191 | 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 503 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce 840M | AMD Radeon HD 7570 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
| Nom de code | GM108 | Turks |
| Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 | 5 January 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1248 | 1251 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1124 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1029 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 863.2 gflops | 624 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 480 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 17.98 GTexel / s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 716 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 16.02 GB / s | 64 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2002 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce 840M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce 840M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7570
NVIDIAGeForce 840M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 705M
NVIDIAGeForce 840M vs
AMDRadeon R7 240
NVIDIAGeForce 840M vs
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020
NVIDIAGeForce 840M vs
IntelUHD Graphics 630
NVIDIAGeForce 840M vs
AMDRadeon 680M
