NVIDIA GeForce 845M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 845M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 845M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1071 MHz vs 1058 MHz
• Around 9% better floating-point performance: 883.7 gflops vs 812.5 gflops
• Around 94% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 64 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• 1002.4x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
• Around 36% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6112 vs 4506
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.295 vs 1.254
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 22.387 vs 18.386
• 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 76.073 vs 23.499
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3332
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3332

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650

• Around 23% higher texture fill rate: 33.9 billion / sec vs 27.62 GTexel / s
• Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1750 vs 1524
• Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 361 vs 213
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2663 vs 2320
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3478 vs 3287
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2663 vs 2320
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3478 vs 3287

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 845M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1524 1750
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	213 361
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6112 4506
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.295 1.254
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22.387 18.386
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	76.073 23.499
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2320 2663
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3287 3478
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3332
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2320 2663
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3287 3478
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3332

Compare specifications (specs)