NVIDIA GeForce 845M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 845M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 845M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1071 MHz vs 1058 MHz
- Around 9% better floating-point performance: 883.7 gflops vs 812.5 gflops
- Around 94% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 64 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 1002.4x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
- Around 36% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6112 vs 4492
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.295 vs 1.254
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 22.387 vs 18.386
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 76.073 vs 23.499
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3332
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3332
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 26 August 2015 vs 27 November 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1071 MHz vs 1058 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 883.7 gflops vs 812.5 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 64 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6112 vs 4492 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.295 vs 1.254 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 22.387 vs 18.386 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 76.073 vs 23.499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3332 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3332 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
- Around 23% higher texture fill rate: 33.9 billion / sec vs 27.62 GTexel / s
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1751 vs 1524
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 361 vs 213
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2663 vs 2320
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3478 vs 3287
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2663 vs 2320
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3478 vs 3287
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 33.9 billion / sec vs 27.62 GTexel / s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1751 vs 1524 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 vs 213 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2663 vs 2320 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 vs 3287 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2663 vs 2320 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 vs 3287 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 845M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 845M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1524 | 1751 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 213 | 361 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6112 | 4492 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.295 | 1.254 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 22.387 | 18.386 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 76.073 | 23.499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2320 | 2663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3287 | 3478 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3332 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2320 | 2663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3287 | 3478 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3332 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.582 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.463 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 545 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 845M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Code name | GM108 | GK106 |
| Launch date | 26 August 2015 | 27 November 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1041 | 1043 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
| Price now | $144.81 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 16.05 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1176 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1071 MHz | 1058 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 883.7 gflops | 812.5 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 27.62 GTexel / s | 33.9 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 64 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 2,540 million |
| CUDA cores | 384 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 5.70" (14.5 cm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB / s | 80.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128-bit GDDR5 |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | DDR3 / GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| FXAA | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce 845M with others
NVIDIAGeForce 845M vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5600 XT
NVIDIAGeForce 845M vs
NVIDIAGRID K160Q
NVIDIAGeForce 845M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650
NVIDIAGeForce 845M vs
AMDFirePro W4170M
NVIDIAGeForce 845M vs
AMDRadeon R5 M335
NVIDIAGeForce 845M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 920MX
