NVIDIA GeForce 910M vs ATI Radeon IGP 320M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 910M and ATI Radeon IGP 320M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 910M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 4.8x more core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 160 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 180 nm
- 150.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 601 vs 4
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 128 vs 101
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 August 2015 vs 5 October 2002 |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz vs 160 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 180 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 601 vs 4 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 128 vs 101 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 910M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon IGP 320M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 910M | ATI Radeon IGP 320M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 601 | 4 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 128 | 101 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2629 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.448 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 155.993 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.574 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.2 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 27.733 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1344 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2590 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3020 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1344 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2590 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3020 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 910M | ATI Radeon IGP 320M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Rage 7 |
Code name | GF117 | RS320 |
Launch date | 18 August 2015 | 5 October 2002 |
Place in performance rating | 1366 | 1363 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 160 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 180 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Texture fill rate | 12.4 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | |
Transistor count | 585 million | 30 million |
Boost clock speed | 160 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | AGP 4x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 7.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 1.4 |
Memory |
||
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | yes |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |