NVIDIA GeForce 910M vs AMD Radeon R5 M255

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 910M and AMD Radeon R5 M255 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 910M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
• Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
• Around 80% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 601 vs 536
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2590 vs 1715
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2590 vs 1715

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M255

• Around 19% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 775 MHz
• Around 82% higher texture fill rate: 22.56 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
• 2.4x better floating-point performance: 721.9 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 135 vs 128
• Around 77% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4650 vs 2629
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.288 vs 6.448
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 166.596 vs 155.993
• Around 72% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.988 vs 0.574
• Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.164 vs 12.2
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 66.631 vs 27.733
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1459 vs 1344
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3020
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1459 vs 1344
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3020

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 910M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M255

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	601 536
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	128 135
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2629 4650
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.448 14.288
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	155.993 166.596
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.574 0.988
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.2 20.164
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.733 66.631
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1344 1459
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2590 1715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3020 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1344 1459
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2590 1715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3020 3357

Compare specifications (specs)