NVIDIA GeForce 910M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 910M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA GeForce 910M

NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 910M

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 601 vs 561
Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2629 vs 2498
2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.448 vs 2.692
Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.574 vs 0.55
Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.2 vs 11.858
Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 27.733 vs 17.753
Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1344 vs 1263
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2590 vs 2479
Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1344 vs 1263
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2590 vs 2479

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	18 August 2015 vs 27 November 2013
Pipelines	384 vs 96
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	601 vs 561
Geekbench - OpenCL	2629 vs 2498
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	6.448 vs 2.692
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.574 vs 0.55
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	12.2 vs 11.858
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	27.733 vs 17.753
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1344 vs 1263
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2590 vs 2479
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1344 vs 1263
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2590 vs 2479

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M

2.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 147 vs 128
Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 161.29 vs 155.993
Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3327 vs 3020
Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3327 vs 3020

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 33 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	147 vs 128
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	161.29 vs 155.993
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3327 vs 3020
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3327 vs 3020

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 910M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

601

561

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

128

147

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

2629

2498

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6.448

2.692

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

155.993

161.29

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

0.574

0.55

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12.2

11.858

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

27.733

17.753

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1344

1263

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2590

2479

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3020

3327

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1344

1263

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2590

2479

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3020

3327

Name	NVIDIA GeForce 910M	NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M
PassMark - G3D Mark	601	561
PassMark - G2D Mark	128	147
Geekbench - OpenCL	2629	2498
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	6.448	2.692
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	155.993	161.29
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.574	0.55
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	12.2	11.858
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	27.733	17.753
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1344	1263
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2590	2479
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3020	3327
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1344	1263
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2590	2479
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3020	3327

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce 910M	NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M
Essentials
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Fermi 2.0
Code name	GF117	GF117
Launch date	18 August 2015	27 November 2013
Place in performance rating	1365	1368
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Technical info
Core clock speed	775 MHz	775 MHz
Floating-point performance	297.6 gflops	297.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	384	96
Texture fill rate	12.4 GTexel / s	12.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	33 Watt	15 Watt
Transistor count	585 million	585 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Memory
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB / s	14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	DDR3
Shared memory	0
Maximum RAM amount		1 GB
Technologies
CUDA
GameWorks
GPU Boost
Optimus