NVIDIA GeForce 910M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 910M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 910M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• 4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 601 vs 571
• Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2629 vs 2492
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.448 vs 2.692
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.574 vs 0.55
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.2 vs 11.858
• Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 27.733 vs 17.753
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1344 vs 1263
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2590 vs 2479
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1344 vs 1263
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2590 vs 2479

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M

• 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
• Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 146 vs 128
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 161.29 vs 155.993
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3327 vs 3020
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3327 vs 3020

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 910M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	601 571
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	128 146
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2629 2492
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.448 2.692
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	155.993 161.29
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.574 0.55
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.2 11.858
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.733 17.753
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1344 1263
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2590 2479
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3020 3327
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1344 1263
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2590 2479
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3020 3327

Compare specifications (specs)