NVIDIA GeForce 910M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 910M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 910M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
  • 4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
  • Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 601 vs 560
  • Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2629 vs 2498
  • 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.448 vs 2.692
  • Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.574 vs 0.55
  • Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.2 vs 11.858
  • Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 27.733 vs 17.753
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1344 vs 1263
  • Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2590 vs 2479
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1344 vs 1263
  • Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2590 vs 2479
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 18 August 2015 vs 27 November 2013
Pipelines 384 vs 96
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 601 vs 560
Geekbench - OpenCL 2629 vs 2498
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 6.448 vs 2.692
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.574 vs 0.55
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 12.2 vs 11.858
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 27.733 vs 17.753
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1344 vs 1263
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2590 vs 2479
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1344 vs 1263
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2590 vs 2479

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M

  • 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
  • Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 147 vs 128
  • Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 161.29 vs 155.993
  • Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3327 vs 3020
  • Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3327 vs 3020
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 147 vs 128
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 161.29 vs 155.993
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3327 vs 3020
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3327 vs 3020

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 910M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
601
560
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
128
147
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
2629
2498
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6.448
2.692
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
155.993
161.29
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
0.574
0.55
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
12.2
11.858
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
27.733
17.753
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1344
1263
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2590
2479
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3020
3327
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1344
1263
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2590
2479
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3020
3327
Name NVIDIA GeForce 910M NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M
PassMark - G3D Mark 601 560
PassMark - G2D Mark 128 147
Geekbench - OpenCL 2629 2498
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 6.448 2.692
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 155.993 161.29
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.574 0.55
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 12.2 11.858
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 27.733 17.753
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1344 1263
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2590 2479
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3020 3327
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1344 1263
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2590 2479
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3020 3327

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce 910M NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M

Essentials

Architecture Fermi 2.0 Fermi 2.0
Code name GF117 GF117
Launch date 18 August 2015 27 November 2013
Place in performance rating 1365 1368
Type Laptop Desktop

Technical info

Core clock speed 775 MHz 775 MHz
Floating-point performance 297.6 gflops 297.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 384 96
Texture fill rate 12.4 GTexel / s 12.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 33 Watt 15 Watt
Transistor count 585 million 585 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6

Memory

Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s 14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz 1800 MHz
Memory type DDR3 DDR3
Shared memory 0
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB

Technologies

CUDA
GameWorks
GPU Boost
Optimus